Software selection,
done properly.
A complete 7-stage evaluation platform — from stakeholder requirements surveys through to post-launch validation. For teams that have outgrown Excel but can't justify enterprise procurement suite pricing.
Trusted by 200+ procurement and IT teams
Projects / ERP Platform Selection
ERP Platform — 2026
| Vendor | Demo | RFI | Stkhlder | Overall | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertex Suite | 88 | 91 | 84 | 88 | Proceeding |
| Meridian Cloud | 76 | 79 | 71 | 75 | Proceeding |
| CoreSystems Pro | 61 | 55 | 49 | 55 | Rejected |
Trusted by procurement, IT, and operations teams
200+
teams running evaluations
4,800+
vendors evaluated
18,000+
stakeholder scores collected
97%
evaluation completion rate
The problem
The way most teams do this is broken.
You shortlist five vendors. You build a scoring spreadsheet. Six people start editing it at once. Someone pastes the wrong column. The vendor portal is a Word doc emailed as a PDF. Your stakeholders' feedback is in a Teams thread nobody can find. Three months later you make a gut-feel decision and write a post-hoc justification.
Enterprise software suites cost tens of thousands a year and take quarters to implement. That's not a solution for most teams.
Evaluation lives in spreadsheets
Multiple versions, no source of truth, formulas that break.
Vendor RFIs sent as Word documents
Free-text answers that are impossible to compare side by side.
Stakeholder feedback in email threads
"I thought Vendor B was good" — with no score attached to it.
Decisions made on gut feel
No audit trail. No defensible reasoning. Just "we went with the one we liked."
How it works
Seven stages. One structured process.
From initial requirements all the way through to post-launch validation.
Capture what stakeholders actually need
Before you look at a single vendor, survey the people who'll use the system. Publicly shareable link — no login required. Rating grids capture both importance and satisfaction with the current system. Insights feed directly into the shortlisting criteria.
Send a structured capabilities questionnaire
Build a requirements template once, send it to every shortlisted vendor. Vendors complete it in a branded secure portal — no account required. Structured answers (Out of the box / Requires development / Planned / Doesn't do it) make comparison instant.
Close the loop after go-live
Auto-generated from your Stage 1 requirements. Send to the same stakeholders 3–6 months post-launch. Did the chosen vendor deliver on what they asked for? NPS score. Capability-by-capability comparison. The loop is closed.
Platform
Everything the full lifecycle needs
Requirements survey — before vendor research
Survey stakeholders with a public form before you look at a single vendor. Rating grids, open text, and engagement tracking built in.
Global vendor directory with community scores
Community scores from real evaluations — fully anonymised, aggregated across all tenants. See how vendors have performed in the market.
Demo & meeting log
Log every vendor interaction with notes, recording links, and a clear Proceeding / Rejected outcome. Nothing lives in email threads.
Structured RFI portal
Capability-grid RFIs with four structured answer options. Vendors complete it in a branded portal — no account required.
Stakeholder testing with invite tracking
Invite stakeholders by email. Track who opened, responded, and who hasn't replied yet. Mark responses as mandatory or optional.
Unified weighted scorecard
Demo 30%, RFI 40%, Stakeholder 30%. One report. Every score traceable to an individual response. Board-ready audit trail.
Auto-generated post-launch survey
After go-live, auto-generate an NPS + capability survey from Stage 1 requirements. See whether the winning vendor actually delivered.
Branded vendor portal
Vendors see your logo and brand when completing their RFI. Professional. Included at all plan tiers.
Comparison
Why not a spreadsheet? Why not an enterprise suite?
There's a gap between "good enough" and "way too expensive." Disqovr fills it.
Note: Loopio / Responsive are vendor-side tools — they help sellers respond to RFPs, not buyers evaluate them.
| Feature | Disqovr | Spreadsheets | Enterprise SaaS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setup time | Minutes | Days | Weeks + implementation |
| Annual cost | Hundreds per year | Free (but your time isn't) | Tens of thousands per year |
| Requirements survey (public link) | Sometimes | ||
| Global vendor directory | |||
| Community scores | |||
| Demo scoring | Manual | ||
| Structured RFI (capability grid) | Sort of | ||
| Vendor portal (no login) | |||
| Stakeholder scoring | Sometimes | ||
| Unified weighted report | Manual | ||
| Post-launch validation survey | |||
| Audit trail | |||
| No IT team required |
What teams say
Decisions people can stand behind
“We ran a six-vendor platform evaluation in three weeks. The same process used to take three months and a shared Excel file nobody could find.”
Head of Technology
Global Energy Company
“The stakeholder scoring phase changed everything. We finally got structured feedback from the people who'd actually use the software, not just the project team.”
Digital Transformation Lead
Manufacturing Group
“Vendors told us our RFI process was the most professional they'd seen. That reflected well on us and got better quality responses.”
IT Procurement Manager
Financial Services Firm
Pricing
Transparent pricing. No surprises.
Enterprise procurement suites start in the tens of thousands and take months to implement. Disqovr is a flat monthly rate. No implementation fees. No per-user pricing.
One-Off Project
One-time1 project · Unlimited everything
Starter
3 projects · Up to 10 vendors
Pro
Most popularUnlimited projects · Unlimited vendors
Enterprise
SSO · SLA · Dedicated support
Built for teams that take security seriously
SOC 2 Type II ready
We follow SOC 2 security controls as standard. Full report available on request under NDA.
GDPR compliant
Data stored in EU-West infrastructure. DPA available. Privacy-by-design from day one.
UK-hosted data
All tenant data stays in the United Kingdom. No cross-border transfer without consent.
SSO & SCIM
SAML 2.0 SSO and SCIM provisioning available on Enterprise plans. Works with Okta, Azure AD, and Google Workspace.
From the blog
Evaluation best practices
Why structured vendor evaluation beats spreadsheets every time
Most software selection processes die in a Google Sheet. Here's how to run an evaluation that produces a defensible decision.
7 min readProcurementRFI vs RFP: which should you send to vendors?
An RFP asks for a proposal. An RFI asks for information. For most software evaluations, you want the latter.
5 min readGuideThe demo scorecard: how to score vendor demos objectively
A good demo scoring template captures independent reactions before groupthink sets in. We'll show you what to include.
6 min readRun your first evaluation today.
Survey your stakeholders, shortlist from a global directory, score the demos, send the RFIs, test with end users — and close the loop after go-live. Your next software decision will be the most structured one you've ever made.
14-day trial · No credit card · Cancel any time