Software selection,
done properly.
Send RFIs, score demos and compare finalists in one place — turning three months of spreadsheet wrangling into a decision you can defend, in weeks. Built for teams who've outgrown Excel but won't pay enterprise-suite prices.
Now onboarding our first teams · 14-day trial · No credit card required
Projects / ERP Platform Selection
ERP Platform — 2026
| Vendor | Demo | RFI | Stkhlder | Overall | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertex Suite | 88 | 91 | 84 | 88 | Proceeding |
| Meridian Cloud | 76 | 79 | 71 | 75 | Proceeding |
| CoreSystems Pro | 61 | 55 | 49 | 55 | Rejected |
What we believe about software evaluation
Score before you discuss
Independent ratings beat consensus theatre. Aggregate first, then debate the outliers.
Every claim, cited
A vendor recommendation is only as good as the trail behind it. Every score links back to its source.
The end-user wins or no one does
If the people doing the work won't use it, the org isn't buying software — it's buying shelfware.
The bar we set
Turn a three-month, spreadsheet-driven evaluation into a decision you can defend — in weeks, with the working shown at every step.
That's the standard we built Disqovr to clear.
The problem
The way most teams do this is broken.
You shortlist five vendors. You build a scoring spreadsheet. Six people start editing it at once. Someone pastes the wrong column. The vendor portal is a Word doc emailed as a PDF. Your stakeholders' feedback is in a Teams thread nobody can find. Three months later you make a gut-feel decision and write a post-hoc justification.
Enterprise software suites cost tens of thousands a year and take quarters to implement. That's not a solution for most teams.
Evaluation lives in spreadsheets
Multiple versions, no source of truth, formulas that break.
Vendor RFIs sent as Word documents
Free-text answers that are impossible to compare side by side.
Stakeholder feedback in email threads
"I thought Vendor B was good" — with no score attached to it.
Decisions made on gut feel
No audit trail. No defensible reasoning. Just "we went with the one we liked."
How it works
Discover. Evaluate. Decide.
From initial requirements all the way through to post-launch validation.
Capture what stakeholders actually need
Before you look at a single vendor, survey the people who'll use the system. Publicly shareable link — no login required. Rating grids capture both importance and satisfaction with the current system. Insights feed directly into the shortlisting criteria.
Send a structured capabilities questionnaire
Build a requirements template once, send it to every shortlisted vendor. Vendors complete it in a branded secure portal — no account required. Structured answers (Out of the box / Requires development / Planned / Doesn't do it) make comparison instant.
Close the loop after go-live
Auto-generated from your Stage 1 requirements. Send to the same stakeholders 3–6 months post-launch. Did the chosen vendor deliver on what they asked for? NPS score. Capability-by-capability comparison. The loop is closed.
Start with the need
Gather requirements before you look at a single vendor
Send a survey to the people who'll actually use the software. Your shortlist gets built on evidence — not the loudest voice in the room.
- Public link or QR poster — no logins
- Rating grids, open text, weighted criteria
- See exactly who has responded
Requirements survey
24 responsesEase of use for non-technical staff
Integrates with our finance system
Reporting & dashboards
Open comment
“Must work on mobile for our field teams.”
Let vendors do the typing
Vendors respond in your branded portal — no account, no email ping-pong
Send a secure link. Vendors answer a capability-graded RFI with structured options you can actually compare — it autosaves as they go and locks on submit.
- One-time code sign-in — no password to manage
- Structured answers, not free text
- Your logo and brand, every screen
Single sign-on (SAML 2.0)
Custom approval workflows
Native mobile app
One number you can defend
Every stream rolls into one weighted, traceable score
Demo, RFI and stakeholder testing combine into a single percentage you can take to the board — and every point traces back to the response behind it.
- Set your own weights per stream
- Partial answers handled fairly (N/A never penalises)
- Export a board-ready PDF in a click
Vertex Suite · scorecard
88%Platform
Everything the full lifecycle needs
Requirements survey — before vendor research
Survey stakeholders with a public form before you look at a single vendor. Rating grids, open text, and engagement tracking built in.
Global vendor directory with community scores
Community scores from real evaluations — fully anonymised, aggregated across all tenants. See how vendors have performed in the market.
Demo & meeting log
Log every vendor interaction with notes, recording links, and a clear Proceeding / Rejected outcome. Nothing lives in email threads.
Structured RFI portal
Capability-grid RFIs with four structured answer options. Vendors complete it in a branded portal — no account required.
Stakeholder testing with invite tracking
Invite stakeholders by email. Track who opened, responded, and who hasn't replied yet. Mark responses as mandatory or optional.
Unified weighted scorecard
Demo 30%, RFI 40%, Stakeholder 30%. One report. Every score traceable to an individual response. Board-ready audit trail.
Auto-generated post-launch survey
After go-live, auto-generate an NPS + capability survey from Stage 1 requirements. See whether the winning vendor actually delivered.
Branded vendor portal
Vendors see your logo and brand when completing their RFI. Professional. Included at all plan tiers.
Comparison
Why not a spreadsheet? Why not an enterprise suite?
There's a gap between “good enough” and “way too expensive.” Disqovr fills it.
Note: Loopio / Responsive are vendor-side tools — they help sellers respond to RFPs, not buyers evaluate them.
| Feature | Disqovr | Spreadsheets | Enterprise SaaS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setup time | Minutes | Days | Weeks + implementation |
| Annual cost | Hundreds per year | Free (but your time isn't) | Tens of thousands per year |
| Requirements survey (public link) | Sometimes | ||
| Global vendor directory | |||
| Community scores | |||
| Demo scoring | Manual | ||
| Structured RFI (capability grid) | Sort of | ||
| Vendor portal (no login) | |||
| Stakeholder scoring | Sometimes | ||
| Unified weighted report | Manual | ||
| Post-launch validation survey | |||
| Audit trail | |||
| No IT team required |
Founding teams
Be one of our first teams
Disqovr is new, and we're hand-picking a small group of procurement and IT teams to run their next evaluation with us. You get a direct line to the founders, a real say in what we build, and founding-member pricing that won't change for you.
Hands-on onboarding
We help you set up your first evaluation — not just hand you a login and wish you luck.
Shape the roadmap
Tell us what your process actually needs. Founding teams jump the queue.
Founding pricing, locked
Lock in early pricing for as long as you stay with us.
Pricing
Transparent pricing. No surprises.
Enterprise procurement suites start in the tens of thousands and take months to implement. Disqovr is a flat monthly rate. No implementation fees. No per-user pricing.
Starter
3 projects · Up to 10 vendors
Pro
Most popularUnlimited projects · Unlimited vendors
Enterprise
SSO · SLA · Dedicated support
Built for teams that take security seriously
SOC 2 Type II ready
We follow SOC 2 security controls as standard. Full report available on request under NDA.
GDPR compliant
Data stored in EU-West infrastructure. DPA available. Privacy-by-design from day one.
UK-hosted data
All tenant data stays in the United Kingdom. No cross-border transfer without consent.
SSO & SCIM
SAML 2.0 SSO and SCIM provisioning available on Enterprise plans. Works with Okta, Azure AD, and Google Workspace.
Latest news
Evaluation best practices
Why structured vendor evaluation beats spreadsheets every time
Most software selection processes die in a Google Sheet. Here's how to run an evaluation that produces a defensible decision.
7 min readProcurementRFI vs RFP: which should you send to vendors?
An RFP asks for a proposal. An RFI asks for information. For most software evaluations, you want the latter.
5 min readGuideThe demo scorecard: how to score vendor demos objectively
A good demo scoring template captures independent reactions before groupthink sets in. We'll show you what to include.
6 min readRun your first evaluation today.
Survey your stakeholders, shortlist from a global directory, score the demos, send the RFIs, test with end users — and close the loop after go-live. Your next software decision will be the most structured one you've ever made.